Jump to content
Toggle sidebar
Star Trek : Freedom's Wiki
Search
Log in
Personal tools
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Navigation
Main Page
Recent Changes
Help
Random Article
Random Image
popular
USS Templar
USS Paladin
USS Rosenante
USS Hades
USS Boudicca
USS Nimitz
USS Cochrane
USS Firebrande
USS Shenendoah
MEF
USS Dennison
USS Champlain
USS Mithrandir
USS Mystique
USS Starfire
USS Spectre
Page history
Federation Civil War
links
STF Home
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Editing
Newsletter/Summer 2007
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
More
Read
Edit
View history
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Q 10=== '''10. In your opinion, who would make a good young Kirk and Spock in the upcoming Star Trek 2008 movie?''' *To me, Shatner as Kirk, Nimoy as Spock, with Kelley as Bones is as classic as you can get. Why mess with a classic? I think we need to move on. I wish that Kate Mulgrew could be in the new Star Trek XI movie as Janeway or anybody else. She's fantastic! -[[herbalsheila]] *I have no idea, but I can't wait to see what they do. I really can't get past the original actors playing those characters, so it's going to be a hard sell for me. I hope that incorporate Captain Archer into the movie. He would still be alive... - [[user:jfrench|Jason French]] *I don’t follow the kid actors, so I can’t suggest any names, but I hope the writers and producers toss off the restrictions of ‘canon’ and do something fresh, like they tried to do with Enterprise. There’s a point where a ‘classic’ crosses the line into ‘stale’. I think that many fans’ adherence to old casts, old writing styles, etc. puts the whole Star Trek scenario in serious danger of stagnating. This is FICTION. There’s no such thing as a ‘canon’. Fictional characters and scenarios should be re-interpreted in new ways by each generation, to meet their own needs. If they are not, the work loses it’s integrity, it’s quality of truth. When a story is so beloved that it evolves into a cultural mythology, as Star Trek has, it doesn’t make sense to stifle the creativity of a new generation by strapping them down too tightly to the previous generation’s vision. Roddenberry’s dream is strong and inclusive enough to withstand a new take on it, and whichever actors they cast, I hope to see just that! -[[GrannyGM]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Star Trek : Freedom's Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Project:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)