Template talk:Infobox Commanding Player - Revision history

MediaWiki spam cleanup: Reverting to last revision not containing links to *.com

2012-11-22T09:45:28Z

Reverting to last revision not containing links to *.com

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:45, 22 November 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	*In Star Trek: Freedom the FO is secondary to the captain and aids in decision making both in and out of game for the duty station. It is not unusual for an FO to completely run a duty station for a significant length of time, believe me, I know that one. I'm more of a partner to my CO than an added appendage. FOs and COs are the significant command players on duty stations doing most of the administrative work and coordinating on most of the key decisions. While the COs final decision is the one that is followed, most captains work with their FOs and come to an agreed upon decision. In other words, FOs do have some significant authority in the game and his/her decisions have executive power. -- [[User:JPB\|JPB]]		*In Star Trek: Freedom the FO is secondary to the captain and aids in decision making both in and out of game for the duty station. It is not unusual for an FO to completely run a duty station for a significant length of time, believe me, I know that one. I'm more of a partner to my CO than an added appendage. FOs and COs are the significant command players on duty stations doing most of the administrative work and coordinating on most of the key decisions. While the COs final decision is the one that is followed, most captains work with their FOs and come to an agreed upon decision. In other words, FOs do have some significant authority in the game and his/her decisions have executive power. -- [[User:JPB\|JPB]]

	*George... I came up with the orginal concept for the command player infobox [http://www.startrekfreedom.com/wiki/index.php?title=Player_Infoboxes&oldid=2824], and I meant it for CO, FO, 2O and 3O. Basically anybody who is apart of a ship's "command staff" -- [[User:KevinSchram\|KevinSchram]]

	*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)

	~~:* Sounds good to me. Maybe a second infobox just for captains if you want too. -- [[User:KevinSchram\|KevinSchram]]~~

	*Who's fighting?? We are just discussing different ideas. -- [[User:George\|George]] 10:09, 27 February 2006 (EST)

	*I didn't mean fighting literaly, just a figure of speach.

Avdh at 14:07, 21 December 2008

2008-12-21T14:07:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:07, 21 December 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:* Sounds good to me. Maybe a second infobox just for captains if you want too. -- [[User:KevinSchram\|KevinSchram]]		:* Sounds good to me. Maybe a second infobox just for captains if you want too. -- [[User:KevinSchram\|KevinSchram]]

	*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see who has the most. Christopher Steinebach

	*Who's fighting?? We are just discussing different ideas. -- [[User:George\|George]] 10:09, 27 February 2006 (EST)		*Who's fighting?? We are just discussing different ideas. -- [[User:George\|George]] 10:09, 27 February 2006 (EST)

	*I didn't mean fighting literaly, just a figure of speach.		*I didn't mean fighting literaly, just a figure of speach.

KevinSchram: fixed timestamp

2006-02-27T21:18:18Z

fixed timestamp

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 27 February 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)		*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)

	:* Sounds good to me. Maybe a second infobox just for captains if you want too. -- ~~		:* Sounds good to me. Maybe a second infobox just for captains if you want too. -- [[User:KevinSchram\|KevinSchram]]

	*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see who has the most. Christopher Steinebach		*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see who has the most. Christopher Steinebach

KevinSchram: formatting

2006-02-27T21:17:57Z

formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 27 February 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)		*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)

	** Sounds good to me. Maybe a second infobox just for captains if you want too. -- ~~		:* Sounds good to me. Maybe a second infobox just for captains if you want too. -- ~~

	*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see who has the most. Christopher Steinebach		*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see who has the most. Christopher Steinebach

KevinSchram at 21:17, 27 February 2006

2006-02-27T21:17:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 27 February 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)		*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)

			** Sounds good to me. Maybe a second infobox just for captains if you want too. -- ~~

	*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see who has the most. Christopher Steinebach		*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see who has the most. Christopher Steinebach

Christopher Steinebach at 16:50, 27 February 2006

2006-02-27T16:50:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:50, 27 February 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	*Who's fighting?? We are just discussing different ideas. -- [[User:George\|George]] 10:09, 27 February 2006 (EST)		*Who's fighting?? We are just discussing different ideas. -- [[User:George\|George]] 10:09, 27 February 2006 (EST)

			*I didn't mean fighting literaly, just a figure of speach.

George at 15:09, 27 February 2006

2006-02-27T15:09:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 27 February 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see who has the most. Christopher Steinebach		*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see who has the most. Christopher Steinebach

			*Who's fighting?? We are just discussing different ideas. -- [[User:George\|George]] 10:09, 27 February 2006 (EST)

Christopher Steinebach at 14:42, 27 February 2006

2006-02-27T14:42:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 27 February 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)		*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)

	*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see the most. Christopher Steinebach		*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see who has the most. Christopher Steinebach

Christopher Steinebach at 14:41, 27 February 2006

2006-02-27T14:41:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 27 February 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)		*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)

			*You don't all have to fight about it, just vote and we'll see the most. Christopher Steinebach

George at 14:32, 27 February 2006

2006-02-27T14:32:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 27 February 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	*George... I came up with the orginal concept for the command player infobox [http://www.startrekfreedom.com/wiki/index.php?title=Player_Infoboxes&oldid=2824], and I meant it for CO, FO, 2O and 3O. Basically anybody who is apart of a ship's "command staff" -- [[User:KevinSchram\|KevinSchram]]		*George... I came up with the orginal concept for the command player infobox [http://www.startrekfreedom.com/wiki/index.php?title=Player_Infoboxes&oldid=2824], and I meant it for CO, FO, 2O and 3O. Basically anybody who is apart of a ship's "command staff" -- [[User:KevinSchram\|KevinSchram]]

			*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:45, 22 November 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	*In Star Trek: Freedom the FO is secondary to the captain and aids in decision making both in and out of game for the duty station. It is not unusual for an FO to completely run a duty station for a significant length of time, believe me, I know that one. I'm more of a partner to my CO than an added appendage. FOs and COs are the significant command players on duty stations doing most of the administrative work and coordinating on most of the key decisions. While the COs final decision is the one that is followed, most captains work with their FOs and come to an agreed upon decision. In other words, FOs do have some significant authority in the game and his/her decisions have executive power. -- [[User:JPB\|JPB]]		*In Star Trek: Freedom the FO is secondary to the captain and aids in decision making both in and out of game for the duty station. It is not unusual for an FO to completely run a duty station for a significant length of time, believe me, I know that one. I'm more of a partner to my CO than an added appendage. FOs and COs are the significant command players on duty stations doing most of the administrative work and coordinating on most of the key decisions. While the COs final decision is the one that is followed, most captains work with their FOs and come to an agreed upon decision. In other words, FOs do have some significant authority in the game and his/her decisions have executive power. -- [[User:JPB\|JPB]]

	*George... I came up with the orginal concept for the command player infobox [http://www.startrekfreedom.com/wiki/index.php?title=Player_Infoboxes&oldid=2824], and I meant it for CO, FO, 2O and 3O. Basically anybody who is apart of a ship's "command staff" -- [[User:KevinSchram\|KevinSchram]]

	*Of course it was you who came up with the original idea. I never said that it was otherwise. In fact, it was you who introduced the idea of adapting the infoboxes to this wiki in the first place. However, as we can see, my redesign of your original idea was quite substantial, and it followed my own interpretation which was even reflected by a change in the text, resulting in "''as a commanding officer''". Of course, now I see that that the phrase is ambiguous (that's why I asked for your opinions in the first place) and, what is more important, now I see you guys want to expand the idea of "''commanding officers''" much further (closer to what was Kevin's original concept). Therefore I propose we change the phrase to something more clear, like "''This player has a character serving in a ship's command structure!''" or something along these lines. What do you say? -- [[User:George\|George]] 09:32, 27 February 2006 (EST)

	~~:* Sounds good to me. Maybe a second infobox just for captains if you want too. -- [[User:KevinSchram\|KevinSchram]]~~

	*Who's fighting?? We are just discussing different ideas. -- [[User:George\|George]] 10:09, 27 February 2006 (EST)

	*I didn't mean fighting literaly, just a figure of speach.