Talk:USS Dennison (NCC-91367): Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 12:46, 19 October 2010

I really feel the previous picture was better - the integrated name and class looked good and there was no need for including the class name in the info below it. Besides it was a different picture to that from the Indefatigable class entry, which made things a bit more interesting. I would like to put the old picture back, if you don't mind. --George 10:30, 15 March 2006 (EST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-*Just put the NCC in Capital. -- Christopher Steinebach
+*I really feel the previous picture was better - the integrated name and class looked good and there was no need for including the class name in the info below it. Besides it was a different picture to that from the Indefatigable class entry, which made things a bit more interesting. I would like to put the old picture back, if you don't mind. --[[User:George|George]] 10:30, 15 March 2006 (EST)
-*I really feel the previous picture was better - the integrated name and class looked good and there was no need for including the class name in the info below it. Besides it was a different picture to that from the Indefatigable class entry, which made things a bit more interesting. I would like to put the old picture back, if you don't mind.
+*Put it back then. -- [[User:KevinSchram|KevinSchram]]
+*I'm back in 2 and half weeks mark it down-Will